EDITORIAL HYPOTHESIS · ORDIEN
Plan need validation
Specify how an uncertain need could be tested without assuming it is true.
Definition and scope
Specify how an uncertain need could be tested without assuming it is true.
Domain: Product
L0 · Hypothesis — original editorial defaults, not empirically verified
AI-assisted editorial review; independent domain review and empirical validation remain pending.
Typical inputs
Candidate needs and consent constraints
Expected outputs
Research validation plan
Proposed success criteria
1. Every selected assumption has a question, observation method and collection boundary.
2. Unverified claims, missing context and required authorizations are explicit; the artifact does not certify external completion.
Evidence expectations
For criterion 1: Assumption-to-question mapping with recruitment and minimization criteria.
For criterion 2: Reviewer-visible scope, unresolved questions and authorization requirements attached to the versioned artifact.
Risks and authority
Leading questions may confirm the initial hypothesis without testing it.
Planning defaults only. Confirm scope, permission and human approval before instantiation; this record authorizes no action.
These are context-dependent planning considerations, not legal advice or execution permissions.
Provenance and quality
Release ordien-world-2026-09-07-v2; revision 1; recorded 2026-09-06.
L0 · Original proposed definition and defaults. Design hypotheses, not empirical findings or universal process requirements. Source: Ordien — Ordien Phase 6 editorial proposals. Scope: Phase 6 original curation, exact subject identified by canonical ID. Inspected 2026-09-06.
Source-supported statements do not validate the proposed workflow, automation performance or economic outcomes. Adapt defaults to the organization's requirements and authority.
Related intelligence
Requires: User need discovery. Relationship quality: L0; applicability requires review.
Contributes to: User need discovery. Relationship quality: L0; applicability requires review.
Proposed prerequisite: Synthesize user needs. Relationship quality: L0; applicability requires review.