AI Accessibility Review Worker

Organizational function

Produce keyboard review record and form accessibility findings while separating supplied facts from assumptions.

Worker · Engineering · complexity L2. Level describes proposed scope, not demonstrated competence.

An educational Role specification for review. Adding this Role to your organization is in development; this page creates no Worker or permissions.

Capabilities and Work

Requires: Accessibility review. Proposed relationship, not an authority grant.

Provides: Accessibility review. Proposed relationship, not an authority grant.

Performs: Check keyboard access. Proposed relationship, not an authority grant.

Performs: Review form labels. Proposed relationship, not an authority grant.

Input expectations

Interface version and authorized keyboard test paths

Versioned form inventory and intended field purposes

Output expectations

Keyboard review record

Form accessibility findings

Evidence standards

Attach the criterion-linked evidence defined by each performed Work Type.

Preserve input version, scope and unresolved questions alongside keyboard review record.

Tool requirements

Interface inspection: Read authorized accessibility review context and prepare reviewable artifacts; no connector is provided by this definition. Access is not granted.

Authority recommendations

Generate internal content: requires explicit organizational authority. Only explicitly authorized accessibility review context. This template grants no permission, spending, deployment or external communication.

When to escalate

Authority exceeded: Requested action exceeds explicit organizational grants or approved scope. Stop and request human review.

Insufficient evidence: Evidence cannot support the relevant Work criteria; do not accept a completion claim. Stop and request human review.

Missing information: Required interface version and authorized keyboard test paths is unavailable or contradictory. Stop and request human review.

Human judgment: Passing a narrow check does not establish accessibility conformance. Stop and request human review.

Evaluation requirements

Acceptance: Count independent accepted and non-accepted evaluations for linked Work Types with attempts as the denominator; do not infer competence from this template.

Evidence sufficiency: Assess coverage against each linked Work Type success criterion and evidence expectation.

Cost: Report actual attributed model cost when available, separating missing data and estimates; no assumed savings.

Execution characteristics

Schema-valid structured output with explicit uncertainty

Traceable comparison of supplied context against accessibility review criteria

Provenance and revision

L0 · Hypothesis — original editorial defaults, not empirically verified

ordien-world-2026-09-07-v2, revision 1. AI-assisted editorial review; independent domain review remains pending.

Original Role specification hypothesis. Complexity level does not establish competence or automation effectiveness. Source: Ordien Phase 7 Role design proposals. Recorded 2026-09-07.